Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quick Hit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Slot machine. It's fairly arbitrary whether the previous history is kept or not, but since nobody has raised concerns about the current history persisting that I shall keep it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Hit

Quick Hit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game. Brianga (talk) 14:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No need for a stand-alone stub article such as this. Fails
  WP:NGAME. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 15:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I'll present two cases for it:
  1. It's been on virtually every gaming floor I visited.
  2. Look at the article history, it was created on November 2014‎ so this is no flash-in-the-pan. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

it may be popular, but where are the

sources? Coolabahapple (talk) 03:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Winner articles are a start. Go to any casino site and this slot game comes up. I could use "basic" instead of "popular" because there is not one gaming floor that doesn't have it. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• weak delete I can't find much in the way of sources describing this or its impact. But there are iPad apps for it and plenty of passing mentions. Probably notable, but heck if I can prove it. Hobit (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm fine with the redirect proposed below. Hobit (talk) 17:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Me too, seems like this has no traction as it is. The purpose of AFD is to gain a consensus and I have no ill will against the nominator Brianga. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Slot machine; the subject does not appear to be individually notable per available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and then Redirect as there's no substance at all and it's imaginably conceivable that there would not be the needed information for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 23:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.