Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel (Ninja Gaiden)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
List of Dead or Alive characters. If there is content worth merging, it can be retrieved from the page history. ✗plicit 01:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
]
Rachel (Ninja Gaiden)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article's entire reception section mostly contains passing mention from the game reviews, listicles, failing SIGCOV and showing no signs of notability on its own like Momiji. It was also heavily refbombed.
ᴛ) 00:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Fictional elements. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ᴛ) 04:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)]
- Merge Cited only to trivial mentions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: Merge to where? I assume Ninja Gaiden but want to clarify in case there's some other article that it could be merged to. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Would be great if List of Ninja Gaiden characters were recreated, without the cruft. Lacking that, the game or series, I guess. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)]
- I would honestly just keep it simple and merge it into the Dead or Alive character list.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Would be great if
- @Zxcvbnm: Merge to where? I assume Ninja Gaiden but want to clarify in case there's some other article that it could be merged to. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect there’s no consensus what or why to merge. This is just another WP:MILL vg character who’s primarily popular for having breasts (one of the sources is literally “A YEAR IN BREASTS”) Dronebogus (talk) 18:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)]
- Redirect per Dronebogus. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.