Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajeev Kumar (IPS)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 21:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeev Kumar (IPS)

)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a

WP:SIGCOV sources. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, India, and West Bengal. UtherSRG (talk) 01:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: - Tagging @Seawolf35:, who reviewed, I would make two points on this. 1. From my side, I don't think being a director of the state police unit is the only notability that counts. He is also a former police commissioner of Kolkata and was involved in Saradha Group financial scandal. So, that also counts. 2. Even if it looks notable on 1E, his successors like Anuj Sharma and Rajesh Kumar also considered as 1E (only commissioner of Kolkata). These persons also don't provide significant coverage references. So they should also tagged as deleted.
    Since creating this page, I prefer to avoid voting. --CSMention269 (talk) 07:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I reviewed so I am involved. But aside from the 1E notability, he also seems to be notable for his appointment, his appointment was among controversy, see [1], and [2] and [3]. There are some more sources, but he is notable for more than the 1E alone. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 15:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hi @Necrothesp, agree with you, but can you or anyone clarify if he is just an acting DGP or full time DGP? (Full time DGP requires approval from UPSC, I guess). If he is acting, he can not be notable based on that appointment. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 05:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@User4edits, according to their official website, it stated that he is serving as principal secretary to IT department holding the charge of DGP West Bengal. I remember last time when Manoj Malaviya was appointed as acting DGP, before confirming by UPSC after few months as permanent DGP of the state. Though no acting word is mentioned in their website (as 24/01/2024 per website), some media stated he took charge as acting DGP on the time of his appointment. CSMention269 (talk) 03:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CSMention269, I do not know of any full-time DGP of even small states such as Goa being the Principal Secy to IT Department; as you said he is holding the charge of DGP, and therefore is only acting DGP, and therefore I would vote for:
  • Draftify until he is appointed as a full time DGP.
User4edits (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.