Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramil Sheriff
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ramil Sheriff
- Ramil Sheriff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails ]
- Delete Maybe later, but right now he fails ]
- Delete per GNG. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, as stated above. Govvy (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or possibly redirect to his club, if he is mentioned in a club-related article. If he goes on to pursue a senior career, he may become notable, but he seems NN as yet. Peterkingiron (talk) 09:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.