Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramin Farahani
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ramin Farahani
- Ramin Farahani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references in the article. And the subject fails WP:ENT. I couldn't find any reliable source on him. Farhikht (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 19:31, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom and there is not even an indication of notability. If this article was recent, I would say speedy delete. Cquan (after the beep...) 22:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. —Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. —Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as since the last !vote was made above 4 days ago, the article now has references,[1] and the individual meets improved over time and through regular editing. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, sources on article now are sufficient to establish notability under the GNG. --j⚛e deckertalk 16:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. With all due respect to the sources, they do not establish notability per WP:CREATIVE. This filmmaker has made only one film. If the film is notable, perhaps a page should be made about that. Yoninah (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Err... looking is always helpful, as there is an artcle about remain and be improved over time and through regular editing. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Err... looking is always helpful, as there is an artcle about
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
- Keep as per schmidt.Wm.Pittman (talk) 01:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have found an article about subject each in the NY Times and in YTNews, and a book describing his works. That should be sufficient for notability. Linda Olive (talk) 16:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.