Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Buehler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Randy Buehler

Randy Buehler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has 14 citations, half of them are to the company website of Wizards of the Coast, the other half are to the company website for Mind Control Software. One is to an online discussion forum. This won't work at all for a BLP. I did a Google News search 2008 to present and found one mention on ArsTechnica. A search of Google Books finds four (4) incidental mentions, though a couple titles are self-published titles and none give any depth. LavaBaron (talk) 12:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
  Talk to my owner:Online 12:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete without prejudice while it's this badly-referenced for a BLP. He may well be noteworthy, but so far this isn't backed and the article just isn't referenced to BLP standard - David Gerard (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise move to
  WP:DRAFTs to allow more time to find sources. BOZ (talk) 00:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep this is a multi-county newspaper article about his tournament career, this discusses his strategies as a winning tournament player, this discusses how he came to lead the MtG development team, this and this quote him in an RS, but it aren't about him. So yeah, GNG is met by a mile and the article could sure use more work. Note that all of these hits were based on the first page of the AfDsources tools--not a whole lot of digging was required. Jclemens (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Jclemens (talk) 04:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep, He meets the subject-specific criteria here (Hall of famer), and meets the GNG besides that. Tazerdadog (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the good work by Jclemens above. Andrew D. (talk) 11:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.