User talk:LavaBaron

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Farmdrop. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dreams from My Real Father. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input here. Regards.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 10:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ecology Party of Florida, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ralph Nader was nominated by the Ecology Party of Florida as a presidential candidate in 2008? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ecology Party of Florida. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ecology Party of Florida), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LavaBaron,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm very sorry to bother you, but, having been instrumental in saving the article I created about the Planned presidential transition of Hillary Clinton, I know that you're a very kind and helpful person. There's a RfC going on at Talk:Michael Portillo (he used to be a prominent British politician) about whether or not predecessors and successors ought to be included in the infobox. I, personally, think that they obviously should, given that every other politician's article (including ones you've worked on) has them, but I'm having trouble getting editors to come along and vote 'Yes'. If you had the time to pop along and support, then I would be greatly indebted to you. Thanks in advance, Specto73 (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Specto73 I'm sorry for my delayed response, I somehow didn't notice your message until just now. My Talk page is a Hot-Spot so sometimes I miss notes. I've !voted here [1]. LavaBaron (talk) 06:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article La Moneda Palace Guard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/La Moneda Palace Guard. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, La Moneda Palace Guard), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LavaBaron. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Monique Luiz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Monique Luiz, star of the famous 1964 political advertisement Daisy, did not see it for herself until 2000? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Monique Luiz. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Monique Luiz), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LavaBaron,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 810 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new

Monitoring the system

section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

On 27 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Palace of Cerro Castillo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Palace of Cerro Castillo is the summer residence of the President of Chile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Palace of Cerro Castillo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Palace of Cerro Castillo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you remember me but I tried to help you when you were blocked some months back.

You have access to newspapers.com. I'm trying to prove or disprove that actress

...William ... I couldn't find it on newspapers.com, however, articles that new are usually paywalled behind a premium feature to which we don't have access. I did find this (bottom of page 157) - https://books.google.com/books?id=FezBbNPAoYoC&pg=PT98&dq#v=onepage&q&f=false - which is published by Bonus Books which appears to be RS. Also, this private pay site [2] does court records searches and lists an Ann Elizabeth Prentiss in a preview screen with a conviction for a 417 violation which is California code for brandishing a firearm [3]. LavaBaron (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, ...William, sorry I wasn't able to be of more assistance. Please don't hesitate to let me know if there's anything else I can do. LavaBaron (talk) 03:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LavaBaron. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States military premier ensembles/archive2.
Message added 00:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please address the comments by me. Regards,

On 1 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article State visits to the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that King Kalākaua of Hawaii was the first foreign leader to head a state visit to the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/State visits to the United States. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, State visits to the United States), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Media from

MB298 - thanks very much for catching this and for speedy nominating them. I was aware Brookhaven was claiming copyright but didn't know Sandia was. Appreciate the info and the correction. LavaBaron (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

LavaBaron I have a question for you. Am I supposed to wait for the nomination to close or can I go ahead with a proper QPQ since the previous one was not accepted? I'm sorry the discussion was clear that a second QPQ was required, but I'm wary that I would be violating any process? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great question, IndianBio. I really don't know. This is a little unprecedented that a review is halted by an editor for violation of policy at the same time said editor commits the same transgression for which he's halted the review. We might learn about what to do from the promoter of the problem review so I'd suggest to just sit tight for a few days. Sorry for this very unreasonable treatment which you've had to experience. If it's any conciliation, it's not unusual. Several of us are regularly subject to this. LavaBaron (talk) 06:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LB, please let me know of any updates and I will surely do a QPQ. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'll keep my eyes on it. I think your original QPQ was fine so would hate for you to have to do another but, unfortunately, this may come down to a case of one editor demanding, and receiving, different privileges from others. Will keep you updated. LavaBaron (talk) 06:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IndianBio - in order to, hopefully, expedite resolution of this question, I've called for a quick consensus check here. You, of course, are free to !vote in it (or not) in whichever direction you feel appropriate. LavaBaron (talk) 06:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Electoral history of George Washington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that George Washington's campaign distributed 160 gallons of alcoholic drink to voters on polling day at the 1758 Virginia House of Burgesses election? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Electoral history of George Washington. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Electoral history of George Washington), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking at look at my DYK. I have carried out your suggestions so if you could take another look that would be great. Thanks. Jack1956 (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article XGRS, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that XGRS was a Nazi-operated radio station in Shanghai during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/XGRS. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, XGRS), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice even number ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I would appreciate if you would would also take a look if you have a problem with this user--Crossswords (talk) 08:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is just weird. I read how you were treated at ANI and I apologize for the lack of civility you ran into there. You look like a hard-working editor with lots of lava on your user page, DYK-use notifications on your talk page, and work in your sandbox. no respect on Wikipedia. :-/ SashiRolls (talk) 23:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but don't worry about it, SashiRolls - it comes with the territory! LavaBaron (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Any suggestions on dealing with this, this and this? I think it should go without saying that I should be able to remove redlinks to deleted articles (standard practice) and make legitimate nominations for deletion without facing a barrage of abuse and reverts. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Va tacito e nascosto you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Va tacito e nascosto for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Smerus -- Smerus (talk) 14:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On

trade embargo by the rest of the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ratification of the United States Constitution by Rhode Island. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ratification of the United States Constitution by Rhode Island), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no prob, Cwmhiraeth - all commissioned U.S. Secret Service personnel, other than those in the uniformed division, are "special agents"; the term "agent" without the prefix "special" is generally used to describe an informant ... however, this is really splitting hairs and I think how you have it is fine from a perspective of common use LavaBaron (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

BLP

requires claims to be clear and for a reliable citation to be given. You've omitted the year and put "XXXX" in a couple of claims, meaning it fails the first test.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Arthur C. Bartner
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LavaBaron! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Arthur C. Bartner. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 23:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ross Volunteers. Thanks! Otr500 (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ross Volunteers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk) 01:06, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:VPP Logo 342342.png

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Coast of arms of Selwyn College

Hello, LavaBaron. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Coast of arms of Selwyn College

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

talk) 08:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:United Nations Formed Police Unit

Hello, LavaBaron. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "United Nations Formed Police Unit

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

talk) 09:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:City of Seattle in media

Hello, LavaBaron. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "City of Seattle in media

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 17:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:USCG SIB 34.png

The file File:USCG SIB 34.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Ross Volunteers

Hello, LavaBaron. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ross Volunteers

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:BeretBlack.jpg

The file File:BeretBlack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:Tricorn342214.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:U.S. Army Patrol cap.png

The file File:U.S. Army Patrol cap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:RedPeakedHat.jpg

The file File:RedPeakedHat.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:WHITEPEAKEDHAT.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Bearskin Helmet.jpg

The file File:Bearskin Helmet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:LAXHelmetWestPoint.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:CavHat8933213.jpg

The file File:CavHat8933213.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Dragoon Helmet with Bearskin Roach.jpg

The file File:Dragoon Helmet with Bearskin Roach.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:Garrison Cap.jpg
• File:GreenBeret.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Campaign hat.jpg

The file File:Campaign hat.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

File:ProFor2015.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ProFor2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 20:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Down Among the Dead Men - Penn Glee Club.ogv listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Down Among the Dead Men - Penn Glee Club.ogv, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 10:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:A7FL logo342.png

Thanks for uploading File:A7FL logo342.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:RomneySpeechSample2341.ogv listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RomneySpeechSample2341.ogv, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 04:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]