Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Boat Rocker
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
]Rebel Boat Rocker
- Rebel Boat Rocker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails company notability as per
WP:CORP: this company only existed for 18 months and never had a product that saw the light of day. How could they be notable if they had no sales, no revenue, no products, no track record... -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Strong Delete: Even the company website isn't actually a website. Not a good sign. The article practically lists a good reason for its exclusion of notability; It openly admits it dissolved without accomplishing or releasing a single thing. Company article with no resources sited, its one game mentioned is a red link in the article... has no any third-party sources or perspective, or discussion of reception/impact or broader culture statement. Delete. Do we have a category for "notable for strong feeling of being unremarkable"? WP:MISSEDTRAIN? If this were a new company I'd say it could be incubated and improved, but odds of there being any new sources or events for it are zero. talk) 21:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - no notability, no released games, no website = no article. --Teancum (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Common or garden delete - Article links to Gamasutra, but a site search unearths no mention of this team. Official website empty. Makes me wonder where the contributor got his information from? Marasmusine (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.