Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recovery (2016 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recovery (2016 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a documentary film, not

WP:GNG all by itself as the only reliable source about the film in play. Nothing here is sufficient to make this film notable enough for inclusion. Bearcat (talk) 14:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom's extensive explanation. I couldn't find anything either. Ravenswing 13:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 13:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Found nothing to suggest a clear of
WP:NFILM on a search of Google, GBooks, Newspapers.com, library.syr.edu, and proquest. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.