Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renault 4L (2009)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "merge" opinions don't address the concerns about poor sourcing. Sandstein 19:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renault 4L (2009)

Renault 4L (2009) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rather pointless article about a rehashed Renault 4 that never passed the concept stage, doesn't pass GNG, sources appear to be either blog posts or images used as references. Nightfury 14:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 14:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 14:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as it doesn't meet any standards for an article. BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (talk) 22:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Renault 4 with an immediate redirect-with-history even if the merge hasn't happened yet. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: lacks RS with SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth. Current and BEFORE sources are inadequate and unsourced or dubiously sourced material should not be merged into other articles.   // Timothy :: talk  17:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete would be better as a section on the history of the brand perhaps. Oaktree b (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Renault 4 --Devokewater (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.