Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit kishnani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit kishnani

Rohit kishnani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails Notability. No signifant work to mention or references to support. Most of the Ref mentioned in the article are PR works. The9Man | (talk) 08:20, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, every source cited except one is the same PR piece word-for-word. Could not find independant sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• This page should not be deleted immediately,as we are trying to improve the article Adnankhan1738 (talk) 05:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  this was originally posted at Talk:Rohit kishnani, I moved it here. —usernamekiran (talk) 08:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Adnankhan1738: Hi. When you said "we are trying to...", what do you mean by we? —usernamekiran (talk) 08:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, sources are suspect and no evidence of other notability in a web search. Also, the image for this article seems lifted from news sources with possible license laundering. I have tagged the image for speedy deletion as well. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 17:46, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Likely a pr-piece, subject fails
  WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Mass delete, in fact. All of these articles are sourced to blatant fake news blackhat SEO sites with no editorial standards. There is no coverage of this person to be found. Praxidicae (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Praxidicae: Hi. You are right about everything else, but I am not sure which other articles you are referring to. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails
  WP:ENT.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. For reasons stated. Dorama285 19:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.