Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Ingram

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Ingram

Roy Ingram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ingram was a competitor in the Olympics who did not win a medal, as such he does not meet our inclusion criteria. Neither of the two sources here have any text on him, they are just sports tables. I did searches in google, google books and google news archives. I found other Roy Ingrams mentioned, such as one who was a mayor of a small place in Alabama. As such there is no reason to assume people would be looking for this Roy Ingram and not the mayor in Alabama, so this is not a good cnadidate for redirect. John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thanks to the efforts of users Park3r and FOARP, I am striking my redirect vote and changing it to keep. There's now enough evidence of notability to, at the very least, give him the "benefit of the doubt" about meeting
WP:GNG. I think a variety of sources from the pre-internet age is pretty convincing. Papaursa (talk) 04:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Both of the sources you give come from the same website, which would mean they count as one source. That is not enough to meet
WP:GNG. The books I saw didn't have what I would consider significant and independent coverage of him, but I could have missed something. Papaursa (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Finding any online-accessible RS from a South Africa is a minor miracle nowadays, finding two separate unpaywalled and non link-rotted online sources is exceedingly unlikely. Which is I needed to do a more than cursory search in Google Books.
Park3r (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
As best I can tell, being South African boxing champion would not be enough to show WP notability. I do empathize with your trying to find pre-internet sources. Papaursa (talk) 23:03, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:58, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.