Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruthin-Pwllglas Golf Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ruthin-Pwllglas Golf Club

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reason as I PRODded: No evidence this is a notable golf club despite its age. A BEFORE turns up news and book listings, but Wikipedia is not a directory of golf clubs. StarM 13:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. StarM 13:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. StarM 13:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/merge Deletion would be contrary to our policies
WP:PRESERVE. The current stub might reasonably be merged into Pwllglas which currently links to it. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete or redirect to
WP:UNDUE to merge, a mention seems to cover this adequately. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 14:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

essay, not a policy or guideline and so has no official standing. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:N is a guideline. This comprehensively fails both. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 15:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Run-of-the-mill golf course. No more special that any of the other 2000-odd clubs in the UK. Founded 1905, but that's not particularly early for the UK. Wikipedia is not a directory of golf clubs/courses and they need to be something out-of-the-ordinary for us to maintain articles about them. Nigej (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, per
talk) 22:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Our policies do not ban deletion. No indication this generic club is notable or that articles on villages must provide details about golf clubs' histories. Reywas92^Talk 08:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, low quality spam that fails GNG by a mile. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nigej....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.