Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rycklon Stephens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh 00:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rycklon Stephens

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

Techinally, He's a enforcer since he is a bodyguard, but delete anyway --Numyht (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete this page. This man is in a current storyline with the wwe and we could expect him to become more involved and more famous as he continues to work with them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.212.104.12 (talk) 11:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment What's the point of deleting the article? In a month the PW project will decide that he has gained notability and will recreate the page. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 19:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep in agreement with comment from Scorpion0422. -- FPAtl (holla, holla, holla) 18:06, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • At this point, no notability is shown, and articles should never be kept on Wikipedia, "just in case" --
    T. C. 18:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Keep - Plays a part (even if it is small) on a major wrestling show. D.M.N. (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So does Ranjin Singh, but his article was just deleted/redirected to The Great Khali. --

T. C. 11:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep hes becoming a major part of Smackdown
  talk) 01:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment What is the standard for notability vis a vis pro athletes? Is it something like "once you get in a game, you're officially notable by WP standards? If so, since he has been a part of Smackdown television, would that mean he's in? And is the standard different for actors and billed parts? 70.161.126.199 (talk) 06:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep If he was some 2-bit jobber a delete might be in order, but he's not, he's playing the same role Nash did in '94. A definate keep. (Sawyer (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.