Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.S. Todi Calcio

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Spartaz Humbug! 13:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

S.S. Todi Calcio

S.S. Todi Calcio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet GNG, non-notable amateur sports team. Article entirely unsourced. Cerejota (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 00:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 00:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Interesting question: for a professional sport, are teams in the top level amateur league in the country notable? I think it's agreed the player's wouldn't be, but I am simply not sure about this. DGG ( talk ) 02:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This is an article that doesn't indicate why it's notable, like many other articles on Serie D teams. Todi has never reached professional status. I support the deletion and should be considered also the deletion of other articles. CapPixel (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - source added to verify existence + the claim that this team plays in Serie D, which is enough to meet
    WP:FOOTYN. And to answer DGG - yes, amateur teams are notable. GiantSnowman 15:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
"All the teams that have played in the national cup are notable" etc.... Todi hasn't played in the Coppa Italia. CapPixel (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Article completely rewritten with added notes. It is now equal to those of the other teams of Serie D: then if this is deleted, should be also be half that of Serie D. In Wikipedia teams of Serie D have always been encyclopedic: or all or none.--93.56.240.111 (talk) 07:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kiddy, where did you find on wikipedia policies that? Yes, half of the articles about Serie D teams should be deleted, I completely agree. CapPixel (talk)
I agree, non-notable Series D articles should be deleted. Those notable teams (such as those who win a Championship) have a better chance of being kept, but I think claims that "All Series D teams are notable" are not supported by the existing notability policies. Arguments that "All series D" must be kept are clueless on notability. That is a ridiculous argument, like saying "All respected amateur organizations should be kept", what are we, a sports magazine? --Cerejota (talk) 21:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We such criteria,
WP:GNG. Amateurs teams not wholly notable, some are, some are not. This one isn't.--Cerejota (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
Mr. IP, you can't vote two times. ;) As you can read in wikipedia policies, most Serie D teams (such as Todi) do not deserve an article. CapPixel (talk) 09:30, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The teams of Serie D have always been considered encyclopedic." Based on what? Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 05:26, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also this year, as well as in other years, each team of Serie D has its own page. Todi plays this year in series D: because it must be the only of 168 teams not to have the page? Teams do not encyclopedic should be deleted all together. But before we should establish the criteria equal for all teams.--93.56.241.51 (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You still haven't answered on which criterion/criteria you base that presuming notability of this article. Also read
WP:ALLORNOTHING, so you can avoid your above kind of argument in a deletion discussion. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 09:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
In other words, i could write an article about my neighbourhood's team, which plays in the
WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY is all nice, but in the end, it justifies ignoring guidelines. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 07:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
How does that not make sense? The cut-off level for Greece would be somewhat higher than for England or Italy, as it is a much smaller country, but it is perfectly sensible for us to have articles on clubs playing at the fourth level, and, in fact, if you follow your link to the league's article you will see that we do.
Phil Bridger (talk) 11:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
Again, kiddy... based on what? By the way, your vote is going to be counted as one. CapPixel (talk) 09:07, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails
    Stuartyeates (talk) 07:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S.S._Todi_Calcio&oldid=1110107326"