Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SONIC CRUISE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 03:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SONIC CRUISE

Non-notable song; there is no need for an article on every one of the artist's "100 songs for 1000 days". None of his songs far have charted and all articles are unreferenced. Somno (talk) 07:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related articles:

)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Somno (talk) 07:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Somno (talk) 07:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the individual singles appears notable enough to justify separate articles. --DAJF (talk) 10:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the lot, all of them fails notability per
WP:MUSIC#Songs. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 10:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - no notability outside of the album, redirect all to album page, per
WP:MUSIC. – Toon ^(talk) 22:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm not seeing evidence that any of the handful I checked pass
WP:MUSIC, merge to the artist. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Ah, wait, some of these (the older ones) were on albums -- so make that merge to artist or album as appropriate. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. And most of them are sold only on web as download song. He released only 5 single CDs. See these Oricon pages. [1] and [2]. Oda Mari (talk) 15:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.