Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sad Beautiful Tragic (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Red (Taylor Swift album). Randykitty (talk) 14:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sad Beautiful Tragic

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG. Has no independent third party notability except minor passable mentions in "Album"reviews. Its chart performance of one week is already present in Taylor Swift discography. This article should be deleted or worse, kept as a plausible redirect to Red. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

ETA: I forgot to check the history and it seems tha the original AFD nomination resulted in merge only and nothing concrete has changed from that. So yeah, this should be merged. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, seems fine. Everyking (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Red (Taylor Swift album)- article doesn't have sufficient coverage per WP:NSONGS to warrant a separate article Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.