Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadhna TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Sadhna TV

Sadhna TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Television channel fails the

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because this TV channel is popular in India. It is one of the most popular religious TV channels of India. It should be improved instead of deleting.
  WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  @ThePremiumBoy: I don't want to sound rude here, but it would really be a good idea for you to read and understand Wikipedia's inclusion policy, WP:Notability, before making any more comments on deletion discussions. "It's popular" is not a valid reason to have an article, what matters is whether the subject of the article has been covered in depth in reliable, independent sources (or if it meets a subject specific notability guideline). I've seen you make a number of these "X should be improved rather than deleted" comments over the last couple of days, all completely devoid of any understanding of Wikipedia policy, and to be blunt it's becoming a bit disruptive. As a relative newbie who's only been here a few days you should be focusing on learning policy and improving articles, rather than getting involved in "behind the scenes" areas. Just some advice from a very long term IP editor. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]