Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Omo
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Sam Omo
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sam Omo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:PROMO
.
Also possible ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Nigeria. Bungle (talk • contribs) 06:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - It is WP:NARTIST. He may be ready in a number of years if independent significant coverage materializes in reliable sources in the future. Netherzone (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Visual arts. Netherzone (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
The Article didn't reference the artist's portfolio, but to a reliable and different sources by independent publishers.Thus, I still think the artist is worth having an article on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikifixR (talk • contribs) 11:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No significant coverage. Sources listed seem to be industry specific or blogs or content provided by the artist. WP:TOOSOON. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete Simply fails ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.