Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Findlay
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - with no independant
reliable sources to base an article on in the article or this AfD, and the strong objection to the claim that breaking your school's record is an encyclopaedic achievement, there isn't much of a case for notability. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Samantha Findlay
non-notable. Nekohakase 19:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, having a college athletics record is not enough for notability. --Dhartung | Talk 23:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, she has more than just records, she was a starter as a freshman on the national championship team and set/tied several school records. She more than meet ]
- KeepAlready proved notability at the national level, a young up and coming athlete--TrulyUnited 23:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —]
- Keep per above. Split Infinity (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Somitho 06:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Setting individual records and winning national championships in popular US college sports would certainly qualify as "at the highest level in mainly amateur sports", and thus pass ]
- Delete The above is, in my view, plain wrong. ]
- Delete. Looks like some of the earlier voters (discussers? commenters?) didn't understand the article. It says she broke school records, not national records. Every school in the world has a school record, and the newer the school's athletics program is, the easier it is to break that record. I'm not saying Findlay isn't a good athlete; it seems pretty clear she must be. But her record is definitely not noteworthy on a Wikipedia-article scale. --Quuxplusone 05:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.