Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanwla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sanwla

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No online sources that I could find--can anybody verify this? I think it looks a little fishy... Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Seems like a
non notable tribe/clan. I also couldn't find a source that verify its existence. -- SMS ^Talk 15:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. Agreed with Sarmad. Fai zan 15:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.