Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sascha Kever

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 01:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sascha Kever

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to pass

WP:GNG; I couldn't find one reliable source covering Kever in depth. There were several passing mentions in match reports but there needs to be more than that to pass GNG. As a fund manager, he has an article here [1] but it doesn't appear to be an independent source. Spiderone 23:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 23:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - referees who officiate at a high level are not automatically notable, and there is no significant coverage meaning GNG is not met. Giant Snowman 16:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable football referee.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with GiantSnowman here. I don't see any evidence they meet GNG, and I don't see any provisions for referees in
talk) 00:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete non notable --Devokewater (talk) 12:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.