Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarborough Town F.C.

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2015 March 2.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scarborough Town F.C.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable - never played in an FA competition Kivo (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
Talk to my owner:Online 23:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep This is one of the successors to the collapsed
alternatives to deletion such as merger with that club or the main article on the town. Note that the AFD was not set up correctly, as noted above. I have fixed the template on the article but am not sure what else might still be wrong. Andrew D. (talk) 08:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - per
GNG. Not sure I agree with merging, which would give significantly undue emphasis to this club in the original Scarborough article. Maybe a short paragraph at best as this was a short lived phoenix club. Fenix down (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per Fenix down, never played at a sufficiently high enough level or received sufficient coverage. Giant Snowman 13:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.