Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screenology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clpo13_(talk) 20:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Screenology

Screenology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Pretty blatant promotional
  WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:48, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• WP:NOTE. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, lack of significant
  WP:TOOSOON. Cabayi (talk) 07:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]