Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex scandals in local schools (Hong Kong)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sex scandals in local schools (Hong Kong)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure if any of this essay is salvageable. Adam9007 (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as OR. Almost none of the article is actually about sex scandals in Hong Kong schools anyway; it only mentions one case. —Nizolan ^(talk) 15:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of the article has nothing to do with Hong Kong. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 15:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 15:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 15:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 15:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Inadequately sourced, pretty generic student essay, not any encyclopedia article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original Research Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as nothing at all to suggest an acceptable Wikipedia article. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.