User talk:Nizolan

Archives

Current 2015 2016 2016–2019 Awards

Hi, I saw your response and so I moved

@

Move over redirect problem. It needs to be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, I've just done that. —Nizolan ^{(talk · c.)} 20:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 20:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nizolan: Hi, just wanted to request you that if possible, kindly take a look at "George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign" created by me, and suggest some points helping me in improving the article in its peer review. I hope to nominate it for GA.Thank-you! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Have provided some comments for you at Wikipedia:Peer review/George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign/archive1. —Nizolan ^{(talk · c.)} 12:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Have fixed all. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nizolan – Thanks again for your Peer Review comments, the article is now a GA. If you wish, please provide some comments on peer review page of a similar article "Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign". Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hierocracy (medieval), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 14th-century hierocrats thought that the pope was the rightful sovereign of the entire world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hierocracy (medieval). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hierocracy (medieval)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - there seems to be quite a back and forth in this newly created article's edit history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirkuk_Massacre_of_1924&action=history. There's a dispute as to whether the references provided actually contain the information they're purported to. Would you be able to compare these two revisions https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirkuk_Massacre_of_1924&type=revision&diff=1013779425&oldid=1013304866 and create an edit which provides the most clear viewed, fact based account of this event?

Thanks!

136.24.201.188 (talk) 07:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit busy at the moment but will have a look once I'm free, cheers. —Nizolan ^{(talk · c.)} 08:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, can you also look into this edit by the same user https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amadiya&type=revision&diff=1018391608&oldid=1016843688? The talk page disputes the edit as wrong info and provides the actual text of the reference https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAmadiya&type=revision&diff=1016646669&oldid=998637160 136.24.201.188 (talk) 18:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nizolan:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by

Template:Fico's Third Cabinet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at