Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shama Khalid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shama Khalid

Shama Khalid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no in-depth coverage in RS. most of the bio contains OR and is not inline cited. Saqib (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• delete - nothing in coverage. Fails
  WP:NWRITER. Störm (talk) 09:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete it fails
  WP:GNG.  samee  ^talk 13:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Unsourced, apparent PROMO. Searches for her turn up article on other, more prominent Pakistanis with the same name.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Search for her on news return related article google book returns her books ^{[1] [2]} Pheeca93 (talk) 21:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that the "hits" on her name in the google search above are to a politician who has the same name and who was governor of a province. Shama Khalid (politician) probably does merit an article. Note also that hits on an author's own writing in a gBooks search do noting to establish notability, what is needed are reliable, secondary sources discussion her books (reviews, interviews, literary criticism) but I have not found that sort of coverage.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.