Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per disambiguation page transformation --

Sharh

Sharh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

non notable term; apparently means "commentary", but there is no explanation of why this is in any way a special term in Islam. Prod removed. Brianyoumans 23:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Please move it to Wikitionary. --Sa.vakilian(t-c) 04:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Hadith. Smmurphy^(Talk) 05:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment At present, the word "sharh" does not even appear in Hadith, except in the directory sidebar. Brianyoumans 06:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• strong Keep term is used often in the names of commentaries to hadith collection, the famous
  Fathul Bari fi Sharh Sahih al Bukhari for example. I needs at the very least to be there as a disambiguation page, and given that, it makes sense to add the template and a short explanations, witch is what we have at the moment.--Striver - talk 11:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Btw, a alternative transliteration is "Shahr". --Striver - talk 11:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, but there is no point in moving to wikitionary yet because there is no definition to move. Could probably be speedied per CSD A1, no context. Rookwood^{Dept. of Mysteries} 15:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I have made it into a disambiguation page because it doesn't deserve to be an article since there was no content. I think it is useful in this regard and if someone finds enough literature to write an article about the subject of shahrs then they can later. gren グレン 03:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This makes a lot of sense. I like it now. Smmurphy^(Talk) 03:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.