Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Walker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating. :) Please

SarahStierch (talk) 03:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Shaun Walker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this "White Nationalist" leader, for a one year period (of an organization that was alleged to be the most well-organized and well-funded "White Nationalist" group in the country but which only had a membership of 2,500), sufficiently notable? Not from where I'm sitting — appears to be garden variety petty criminal, as far as far as I can see, so not notable from that angle, either. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 14:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unless the subject has done anything actually notable in his role as an extremist or convict, he remains an ordinary person who has so far not led a life worthy of any note. --gilgongo (talk) 00:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no claim to notability, and we're wandering into
wp:BLP issues, in particular the harm clause about someone who's notable just for being a white nationalist who briefly lead a group and is a criminal. Two strikes against and no reason to keep the article. Neonchameleon (talk) 01:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reason whatsoever to keep a BLP with sensitive material when the claim to notability is weak. I remember an IP tried long time ago to delete the information about the arrest record so maybe
WP:HARM applies here. --Jmundo (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.