Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signal 21 Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:19, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signal 21 Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches are only providing short mentions; does not meet

WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no working references, and the article suggests this label never achieved notability. A redirect to
π, ν) 03:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
- [1] *might* be enough for a redirect.
  π, ν) 03:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Keep Jeremyeyork (talk) 08:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to
^{• whaddya want? •} 03:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.