Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simmie Free

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Simmie Free

Simmie Free (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This moonshine maker gets a few pages in a book and a passing mention in a USA Today article, which doesn't satisfy

• Strong keep. This coverage, which is what the article is mostly based on is very in-depth, as is this coverage. Those two alone might be enough to satisfy
  WP:GNG. He gets more than a passing mention (although definitely not in-depth coverage) here, as well as some nice coverage here. He also gets several other pretty good mentions on other links you can find on Books, all on the first 2 pages. There are also a couple of nice mentions in two other newspapers. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep likely as this seems acceptable and likely to find more with archived sources, certainly likely not a priority for deletion at this time. SwisterTwister talk 07:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• weak keep - marginal notability. poorly written article. DangerDogWest (talk) 02:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Meets
  WP:BASIC. See [1], [2]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.