Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six (TV series 2)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Six (TV series 2)
- Six (TV series 2) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is essentially a recreation of
MOS:TV violations. The editor in question, PemGateway, doesn't seem to understand basic policy and gudelines, especially when it comes to editing TV articles. If you look at the edit history of Six (TV series), you'll see the editor in question make mass edits containing multiple errors, then myself having to come by and constantly clean it up and bring the article back to basic Wikipedia standards. The editor is basically creating "their version" of the article, albeit a very poor one. There does not need to be two articles, any information can be added to Six (TV series). Edit: Another editor, Launchballer previously put it up for deletion, but PemGateway deleted the notice. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – wholly redundant with ]
- ERASE ME Not worth fighting with silly Pedanticists — Preceding unsigned comment added by PemGateway (talk • contribs) 08:31, July 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Note: The comment above and comments at the article would seem to be the article's original author requesting its deletion (though I'm not sure this article is subject to ]
- Delete. As a television editor, I can see and appreciate the page creator's zest for creating it. However, nothing substantial is within that hasn't been stated in its main series article. Usually, TV-page etiquette follows a path of main, episode-list page, then notable season articles. This appears to be the creator's intent, only poorly done and skipping some steps (namely, the first season's article. — Wyliepedia 12:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom Domdeparis (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.