Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slavica Ecclestone

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slavica Ecclestone

Slavica Ecclestone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see how this justifies a separate article. notability is not inherited -- even if it comes with a L 740 million settlement. DGG ( talk ) 09:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the rule that deals with the situation is NOT TABLOID. DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)`[reply]
In contrast with the examples cited in
WP:NOTNEWS, being featured in the Sunday Times’ Rich List is an indication of enduring notability. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 04:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - NOTINHERITED means that someone isn't just directly notable for someone else's notability. It doesn't mean that if their coverage (and the actions that sparked that coverage) came about because of another, that they too are waived. Plenty of coverage on Slavica specifically. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.