Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundgenerator.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soundgenerator.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Claims large number of visitors (unreferenced) but seems to be a non-notable website. Boleyn (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 13:20, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article does not provide and I cannot find evidence for notibility. The website that bought them out and incorporated them does not itself have an article, not does it look like it should--Alexa gives current site rank of >2.6 million. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks coverage or any other indication of encyclopedic relevance. --Michig (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.