Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steppe-tundra
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Note that this does not preclude anybody from splitting, or merging, or split-merging (?) to their hearts content. ยท Katefan0(scribble) 19:04, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Steppe-tundra
I suppose this entry should be deleted, as it duplicated info contained in steppe and tundra. Or perhaps split? --TintoRetto 14:11, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - steppe tundra is real, and it is possible to write an encyclopaedic article here. This is not a candidate for deletion. Guettarda 23:43, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Split/Merge - This article is poorly placed (steppe is a classification of environment, seperate but similar to tundra). Moreover, the seperate entries for each are more accurate. ogl.codemonkey 05:37, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Split and merge? How, pray tell? It's neither steppe nor tundra, so why merge it into two things it is not? Guettarda 19:01, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Steppe-tundra is a palaeo community without modern analogues. I cannnot see how merging it into either of the two modern communties makes any sense. It's like merging ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.