Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Denning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Steve Denning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, only links to own personal website, seems more like promotion Sheroddy (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 15:12, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

• Weak keep He has one book that is held in >1K libraries in Worldcat (
  Royal Society of Arts, and nearly everyone there has a WP page. The only book review I found was on the American Express site. He does do the speaking circuit, but that isn't terribly notable. LaMona (talk) 02:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep more or less per LaMona. The nom's assertion that Forbes (forbes.com) is the subject's "personal website" should bring their WP:COMPETENCE into serious question. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the above, and the article was nominated for deletion by a new user User:Sheroddy who began nominating articles for deletion within their third edit. While I strongly believe that we should be bold this is maybe a bit too bold. Theredproject (talk) 15:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.