Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Creek Dam
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete Alexf (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Stone Creek Dam
- Stone Creek Dam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional place from a game...no indication of notability. Article completely unreferenced and written in an "In-universe" tone. John from Idegon (talk) 06:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Fails WP:V. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)]
- Delete. This might qualify for speedy deletion under A7, but I'm not entirely sure whether or not things held on an online game server count under that criteria. Either way, it fails notability guidelines as a whole. (。◕‿◕。) 07:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)]
- Delete. Does not meet the requirements of notability for fictional-related contents. --talk) 08:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)]
- Speedy delete.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 14:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 14:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)]
- Delete Just delete. There's nothing here other than fictional in-universe game play details. Lack of references only emphasizes the problems. Alansohn (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Latest additions by the article creator have moved this into G11 territory. Request the next passing admin to snow close this. John from Idegon (talk) 21:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per CSD A7 --Cameron11598 (Talk) 06:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.