Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StreetCred
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
StreetCred
- StreetCred (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non
notable website. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sourcing. Currently cobbled together from partners, passing mentions and press releases. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- delete everything about this article says "this subject is not notable and wasn't for the year it existed either". At best, merge and redirect to T.I. - David Gerard (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per above, at best merge into TI. Non-notable website without significant independent reliable sources for notability verification. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete An article about a short-lived website with minimal evidence of lasting notability. Besides the sourcing problems, it name-drops "Hip hop icons" which had embraced it. Without a source for such an "embrace", I would worry about a violation of the BLP policy: "Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research." Dimadick (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.