Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strictly Slots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly Slots

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim to notability, and no sign of it either. A search for sources found nothing except adverts and Wikipedia clones. bonadea contributions talk 06:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 09:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (media). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Citing to places you can purchase a subscription do not establish notability. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 12:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable promotional material.
talk) 13:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.