Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuck like Chuck
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:45, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Stuck like Chuck
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Stuck like Chuck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails NFILM. Low-budge movie without evidence of any impact. Most of article is promotional. Sourcing is especially poor, and many are unrelated to film itself ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 18:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 18:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note that article was created by "Onmyownproductions" which shares its name with the production company of the film. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 18:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: fails NFILM, consequently fails GNG. Could only find, asides from sources in the article, a review from 2014, which is of dubious significance. Still fails NFILM; requires two significant reviews five years after release. Iseult Δx parlez moi 18:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.