Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumar Almadjed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sumar Almadjed

Sumar Almadjed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails
  significant coverage. The best I found was this, mostly an interview but has some prose in it. The rest I found were interviews and routine stuff. Happy to reconsider if someone has better luck in finding something significant. Alvaldi (talk) 18:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - I found 10+ articles about him from hd.se here, as well as [1], [2],[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9], among many many more Swedish sources. Clearly significant figure in Swedish league football with ongoing career in fully pro Allsvenskan, which receives lots of media coverage. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. As search in Mediearkivet, the dominating Swedish newspaper archive from the last decades, gives 1128 hits when searching for his name. Most of these are trivial mentions from match reports, but there seems to be plenty of real articles as well, not just interviews. I'll see if I can find the time to take a proper look; it's a time-consuming effort due to the number of articles. /Julle (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 19:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes GNG as per significant sources above.--Ortizesp (talk) 06:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The amount of
  WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  What the actual fuck. JoelleJay (talk) 17:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. The sources linked above (that aren't premium content) are interviews, and the meager independent commentary within them is mostly just routine transfer news. What do the paywalled articles say? JoelleJay (talk) 23:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there is enough non-interview prose in the source provided by Alvaldi and some of the ones provided Das osmnezz to pass
  WP:GNG. Frank Anchor 14:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]