Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine / At the Drive-In

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sunshine / At the Drive-In

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this yesterday with the reason "Unnotable split single - cant find coverage, no references, charting, nothing". Prod was removed by an editor with the reason that At the Drive-In are notable. Indeed they are, but not every release by a notable act has sufficient coverage in reliable sources for a stand-alone article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability isn't inherited; no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, userfy for me if deleted: You'll note that when I removed the PROD, I didn't just give "the band is notable" as the reason...I said that because they are notable and received wide coverage, I suspect (or at least hope) that sources for an article on one of their releases would be obtainable. I intend to make a good-faith effort to find some, but I suspect that will take me longer than 7 days (between real life, other on-wiki projects, and my internet being out for a couple of days). I can't really argue strongly against deletion at this point, since I don't have adequate sources at the moment from which to improve the article, but if it is deleted I'd like to hold it in userspace so that I may have more time to search out sources. Thanks. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Changing my opinion to keep due to improvements and sources added by Theornamentalist. --IllaZilla (talk) 01:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - New Wave of American Heavy Metal (some info) The new Rolling Stone album guide (3.5 stars) Giant robot, Issues 16-23 (not much at all, but can't hurt/released as 12") Artist Direct (track info/basic) Film Junk Review (review/not entirely a RS) Band Stereo Killer (Bio of Sunshine, mentions in passing) Vh1 (tracklisting) STNT (review/info. in French) IMPACT Press (Review) AllMusicGuide (very basic) Mowno (info/possibly blog?) CMJ Chart (#3 Debut, pretty impressive for a split EP/debut IMO) CMJ chart #60 - Theornamentalist (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not seeing that any of these qualify as
  reliable sources...Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  - There aren't entire articles on the album, just wanted to show there is reliable information on the album, and in my opinion, enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia - Theornamentalist (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks for the sourses, Theornamentalist, I'll have a look when I get home and see if I can use them to improve the article. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - eh, added in references/general info and wikified and bit, still could use a copyedit though. - Theornamentalist (talk) 00:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep based on new sources found by theornamentalist riffic (talk) 06:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.