Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrey First
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ]
Surrey First
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Surrey First (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a municipal political party represented on a single suburban city council, not
WP:GNG-worthy media outlet, ORGDEPTH and GNG both militate that one hit of media coverage isn't enough in and of itself.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
]
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't disagree that the article needs a lot of work. However, one can find plenty of significant reliable sources from national media on this municipal party. For example, there's these articles from The Globe: Surrey Mayor’s departure marks the end of an era, Surrey First names Linda Hepner as new mayoral candidate. From the Vancouver Sun: Surrey First: The political non-party. From the CBC: Can Surrey First's political dynasty remain on top with a new leader? and Profiling Surrey's political parties: Surrey First, led by Gordie Hogg. There's plenty of reliable references, just an article that needs much improvement. ⁂CountHacker (talk) 09:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The sources provided by CountHacker provide the ]
- Keep per CountHacker. There is a lot of coverage about them, meeting WP:NONPROFIT. 2A01:799:2E3:C500:556:815E:86C2:7DB1 (talk) 15:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.