Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synaptopathy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Synaptopathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is unreferenced and to my best knowledge original research.

talk) 03:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as insufficiently sourced. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Comment - Just a note, per
WP:NRVE, topic notability is based upon the availability of reliable sources, rather than whether or not sources are present within articles. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Probably keep - This is a legitimate topic, and sources exist that cover it. Examples include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The depth of coverage in most of these is minimal, so more research is needed to find those that provide
significant coverage. The first two sources in my !vote above cover the topic more in depth than the rest. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep See Synaptopathy: dysfunction of synaptic function? for an example of a source which covers the topic in a general way. Warden (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per good finds by Northamerica1000 and Warden. There is enough depth in these sources, and in the references cited in the paper found by Warden, to both satisfy notability concerns and to support an article on this relatively new topic. --Mark viking (talk) 21:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sources aren't present in the article, but are available. The subject meets
WP:GNG per the sources Northamerica1000 provided above. - Aoidh (talk) 23:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.