Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talita Baqlah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sourcing has been identified, and no one has argued that it's insufficient. Star Mississippi 01:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talita Baqlah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Jordan. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Olympics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete
wp:SIGCOV, as stated by the nominator; coverage is minimal, and apparently hasn't earned medals. Nythar^T^.^C 08:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

keep national record holder. plenty of significant coverage, did you miss it? allternatively, delete also Khader Baqlah, lest you be called biased. --Afoothiked (talk) 23:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Afoothiked: Could you share links to two or three of the best examples of SIGCOV that you uncovered?. Cbl62 (talk) 03:35, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cbl62: - I found a few newspaper articles (in the English-language daily newspaper The Jordan Times), [1], [2], [3], and have included these in the article. Guess there could be more coverage in Arabic-language media, but am not able to read that language. Oceanh (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely SIGCOV IMO. Cbl62 (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.