Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Lindsey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Lindsey

Taylor Lindsey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Question. Has he played in a major league baseball game? That seems to be the crux here, but I was unable to confirm this as I don't understand what it means for him to be 'drafted' by a major league team, and couldn't find confirmation of him having played in the major league. Ross-c (talk) 06:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No he hasnt.. he was drafted but only played for the minor league affiliates. Spanneraol (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lindsey has never played a MLB. He fails
  WP:NBASE....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to List of Los Angeles Angels first-round draft picks. Spanneraol (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - fails WP:NBASE but passes
  WP:GNG with at least 2 significant articles about him linked in the article in question plus I also found this one. Rlendog (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete: Fails
  pseudo biography permanent stub. Otr500 (talk) 04:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• GNG requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. I am not sure what defines a "mundane" news report or why this article, even if it is "mundane", would not be considered significant coverage given that it is a substantial length article from a reliable independent source of which Lindsey is the subject. This article is also all about Lindsey and is hardly a news report. And this is also a significant length article about Lindsey from an independent reliable source and so I am not sure why this would not meet the actual GNG definition. Rlendog (talk) 21:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Meets
  WP:NBASE. Ejgreen77 (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  WP:RUNOFTHEMILL and thus actually doesn't go towards establishing GNG. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.