Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technique Recordings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Technique Recordings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable label. The article relies on self-published sources, press releases and minor media; I couldn't find sources elsewhere that would back a notability claim, either in print or available online. PK650 (talk) 22:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 22:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 22:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Non-notable record label. WP:BEFORE turns up nothing other than primary sources or interviews. nearlyevil665 14:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, no reliable coverage available on google news. Frigidpolarbear (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.