Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nuttery Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Nuttery Entertainment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:ORGIND scope_creep (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (Re
WP:ORGIND) It seems like the page was originated by the company or someone close to it, messy and promotional. I have removed all extraneous/'promotional' text, and have rewritten/restructured most of the page to keep it in line with similar company pages. Links and sources added where needed as well. KnowNaughtNinja (talk) 01:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

References

Comment KnowNaughtNinja, you see to have voted twice, which is strictly illegal voting. scope_creep (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Was trying to respond to the two fails separately. Went ahead and merged the two. KnowNaughtNinja (talk) 01:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP:GNG. Per KnowNaughyNinjas rationaleBabbaQ (talk) 12:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:17, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - while
WP:GNG (as a partnership with Bandai Namco could not be notable in of itself). As such, while I think the article is at least keep-able until the status of it's notability is cleared up, I'm on the fence on whether to swap to a delete position or not. Kirbanzo (talk) 03:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Let's face it, all this company has to go for it are de facto rewritten press releases about its partnership with Bandai Namco. This is not enough for any notability policy I can think of. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a "real registered company" and a partnership with a notable company do not make a company notable and are not guideline or policy based arguments for keeping. Coverage appears solely in connection with that partnership; that coverage does not give much information about the company and thus fails
WP:CORPDEPTH Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete None of the references are intellectually independent and therefore fail
HighKing⁺⁺ 18:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.