Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phishing Manual

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to

(non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The Phishing Manual

)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NBOOK - could easily be summarized in a section in the Phish article. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 07:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 07:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947( c ) (m) 04:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect, nom is correct, there's no justification for a separate article here, and a brief mention at Phish is all that is needed. Same goes for the similar Phish items here at AfD. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.