Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sound World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Sound World

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not see refs that support notability Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems like a worthy charity, but I cannot find any in-depth independent reliable sources for the organization. --Mark viking (talk) 00:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Yes sources are light on. They wold stand up much better if they were inline references. Section Chochlear Implants is not relevant here and needs to go, so that leaves only four lines of text, but that is four time as many as some locality articles will ever have. I suspect a bit of work could find more sources and more content. Aoziwe (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG...Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.